Home / Dashboards / Test analytics
Dashboards · Level 3 of 3

Test analytics dashboards

The eight-tab Test analytics dashboard, built for classroom assessments where each item has a single correct answer. Reliability, item difficulty, distractor analysis, skill rollups, item health.

Test sub-tab · Phase 100

Overview

Headline numbers + score distribution

Algebra Unit Test, n=8278% pass · α 0.84
OverviewReliabilityDifficultyQuality+4
Pass rate
78%
at 60%
Mean
68.4%
range 28-100
α (KR-20)
0.84
25 items
SEM
1.9
on raw
Score distribution
pass cut

Six KPI tiles (mean, median, range, SD, items, pass rate), score-distribution histogram, top strongest and flagged items, AI narrator pinned at the top in teacher voice.

Test sub-tab

Reliability

Reliability of the test itself

Algebra Unit Test, n=82α 0.84 · ω 0.86
OverviewReliabilityDifficulty+5
α (KR-20)
0.84
25 items
McDonald ω
0.86
1-factor PAF
Split-half
0.78
Spearman-Brown
α if deleted (top movers)
If Q12 out+0.03
If Q05 out+0.02
If Q03 out-0.01

Cronbach's alpha as KR-20 on dichotomous items, McDonald's omega, Spearman-Brown split-half, SEM, alpha-if-deleted with delta per item.

Test sub-tab

Difficulty

How hard is each question?

Algebra Unit Test, n=8225 items · sorted
ReliabilityDifficultyQuality+5
% correct, easy to hard
Q0771%
Q1469%
Q0367%
Q1543%
Q1238%
Q0528%

Percent correct per item with labels Very Easy (90%+), Easy, Moderate, Hard, Very Hard. Inline horizontal bar chart sorted by difficulty.

Test sub-tab

Quality

Does each item discriminate between strong and weak students?

Algebra Unit Test, n=82r_pb · top 27% vs bottom 27%
DifficultyQualityAnswer Choices+5
Item% correctr_pbLabel
Q0771%0.62Strong
Q0367%0.48Good
Q1543%0.22Review
Q1238%0.14Problem
Q0528%-0.08Negative

Point-biserial correlation between the item and the rest-of-test total, plus the classical top-27% vs bottom-27% discrimination index. Labels Strong / Good / Review / Problem / Negative.

Test sub-tab · Phase 73

Answer Choices

Are wrong answers doing their job?

Algebra Unit Test, n=82Q12 (flagged)
QualityAnswer ChoicesSkill+5
Q12 distractors
A26%
B (key)38%
C32%
D4%
Possible miskey
Option C pulls 32% of the class and 22% of the top quartile. The prompt may be ambiguous; consider revising "Which step solves" to "Which is the first step."

Per-item per-option count plus the share of top-quartile students who chose each option. Flags non-functioning distractors and possible miskeys.

Test sub-tab · Phase 73/97

Skill Performance

Which skills are sticking?

Algebra Unit Test, n=824 skill tags
Answer ChoicesSkillPre/Post+5
SkillItemsMeanBand
Algebra981%Mastery
Geometry871%Proficient
Fractions379%Proficient
Word problems541%Foundational

Mean percent correct by skill tag with mastery bands. Skill x question-range matrix (rows = skill tags, columns = item buckets) with cells color-coded by mastery band.

Test sub-tab · Phase 73

In-test Pre/Post

Did students improve within the test?

Algebra Unit Test, n=82First half vs second half
SkillPre/PostItem Health
First half
64%
Q1-12
Second half
52%
Q13-25
d_z
-0.51
paired t = -4.62
Drop in second half
Students fatigued or material climbed in difficulty. Check the difficulty curve through the test.

Paired t-test between two user-selected item subsets (default first half vs second half). Cohen's d_z, plus per-respondent improved / unchanged / declined counts.

Test sub-tab · Phase 73

Item Health Report

Composite per-item status

Algebra Unit Test, n=8225 items classified
Pre/PostItem Health
Health summary
Strong · 12
Easy + discriminates · 4
Hard + discriminates · 5
Too easy · 1
Problem · 2
Possible miskey · 1
Action list
Q12 audit answer key · Q05 rewrite or replace · Q15 review wording · Q07 add to bank.

One label per item: Strong / Easy but Discriminates / Too Easy / Hard but Discriminates / Problem / Possible Miskey. Built from difficulty, point-biserial, and distractor signals.