What you hand to parents, departments, and reviewers
The deliverables teachers and assessment authors export.
Every analysis produces an artifact ready for the parent conference, the department meeting, the principal's report, or the certifying-body packet. The math is exposed, the writing is editable, and the item-level evidence is right there.
Item analysis . Algebra Unit 4 Quiz
n = 28 students . KR-20 = 0.78 . Mean = 76%
| Item |
Difficulty |
Discrimination |
Distractors |
Flag |
| Q1 |
0.78 |
0.41 |
All used |
Good |
| Q2 |
0.92 |
0.05 |
B unused |
Too easy |
| Q3 |
0.54 |
0.48 |
All used |
Good |
| Q4 |
0.18 |
-0.12 |
All used |
Likely miskeyed |
| Q5 |
0.64 |
0.36 |
All used |
Good |
PDF
Learner score report
One per learner, broken down by skill tag. Item-level performance, missed items in context, and a plain-language paragraph instructors can share with learners, families, or advisors.
PDF
Group summary
Group-level distribution, per-skill mastery, and the items most learners missed. Useful for the next instructional block, department meeting, or certification review.
Revision plan
Item revision recommendations
Each flagged item comes with a recommended action: keep, revise the prompt, replace a distractor, double-check the key, or drop. The next test starts from those recommendations.
Change report
Pre/post change summary
Effect sizes, Reliable Change Index, and per-learner tier counts. The score lift is labeled with the evidence behind it: likely learning gain, possible measurement drift, or interpret with caution.